
 |
Economic Development Reference Guide
Real Estate Redevelopment
Vacant and older buildings blemish many urban neighborhoods, contributing
to blight, crime, and perceptions of the neighborhood as an undesirable place to
live and do business. Vacant buildings lead to disinvestment. The Urban Land
Institute estimates that the United States holds 876 million square feet surplus
of industrial space, which present threats to neighborhoods if left unattended,
and opportunities if reused or redeveloped.
Property redevelopment and reuse refers to the process of taking previously
developed property or areas to a higher, more productive use. Redevelopment
consists of demolition with new construction, or the process of improving an
area through both new construction and property reuse. Property reuse is the
renovation or rehabilitation of an existing building. Reuse and redevelopment
projects, often located in distressed neighborhoods, are usually high-risk
development projects from a private sector point of view, and require public
action to leverage private activity.
As commercial and residential activity continues to move from the urban core
to the suburbs, cities lose jobs and tax base, and face higher levels of blight.
Redevelopment and reuse provide ways to rebuild neighborhoods economically,
remove blight, and improve the quality of life.
The economic developer may act as a coordinator among developers, banks,
regulatory authorities, and private businesses, which are the end-users of most
redevelopment projects. Urban economic developers may become involved in real
estate redevelopment to revitalize their core areas and retain firms within the
city limits.
Trends in Real Estate Redevelopment
Redevelopers are looking to cities not only for existing buildings and
infrastructure, but for growing markets. Many cities in the United States are
littered with empty shells of buildings that once housed manufacturing firms,
derelict shops, and huge empty warehouses. Many of these buildings are in or
near to city centers, making the buildings ideal for redevelopment and meeting
the demands of the new economy. The following are key trends:
- Buildings are being reused for mixed-use projects incorporating retail,
office, and housing, or solely as office developments. The size of older
industrial buildings and redundant department stores makes them difficult to
redevelop. Mixed-use development can capitalize on this by including multiple
components that serve different markets simultaneously.
- Old office buildings, lofts, and warehouses are being retrofitted with high
bandwidth fiber optic cables and microwave antennas for IT firms and other
businesses needing large open plan buildings.
- Carrier hotels for IT businesses are being developed from old
warehouses in urban cores because these buildings offer high load bearing
capabilities and high ceilings essential necessary to store large amounts of
equiment.
- Mixed-use projects in central urban areas include more market-rate and
low-income housing to meet demand for housing closer to the workplace.
- Public finance continues to play a crucial role, especially in the
revitalization of distressed neighborhoods.
- Federal funding and financing for redevelopment comes primarily through HUD
community development block grants, HUD section 108 loans, EDA public works
grants, and various revolving loan funds.
- Real estate redevelopment is often part of downtown and neighborhood development.
- Public-private partnerships are
increasingly common in redevelopment projects.
- Redevelopment projects addressing environmental concerns include features
like:
- Quality insulation to cut HVAC costs
- Natural lighting to cut electricity costs
- Solar-heated hot water
- Reuse of building materials, such as bricks from demolished buildings
- "Smart" buildings, which sense when people are (not) present and adjust
heat, lighting, etc. accordingly.
- Military bases are often redeveloped for economic
development purposes.
Benchmarking and Evaluating Real Estate Redevelopment Programs
Like brownfields projects, redevelopment
and reuse projects are pursued to meet economic and social objectives.
Evaluation, therefore, should consider both. Redevelopment and reuse projects
require long time frames to implement; thus, it should be expected that economic
benefits will increase over time. Studies of EDA projects showed that full
jobs-creation impacts often take six to ten years to emerge. Project comparisons
should take time frame into consideration.
Because property reuse and redevelopment may not create as many jobs as
business finance, retention, or attraction programs, it should be evaluated
using a wide range of indicators. C rucially, the main goals of property
redevelopment and reuse are to remove blight, improve the quality of life, and
create an environment that attracts new commercial and residential investment.
Job creation is only one of several key objectives, so it should be used as one
of the judging criteria, not the main criterion.
Quantitative measures
- Cost per job created/retained
- Private sector leverage
- Percent of jobs held by local residents/low income persons
- Average salary of jobs created
- Spinoff private investment
- Crime rates
Qualitative measures
- Significance of project to community
- Stated project goals and the degree to which they have been achieved (e.g.
creation of open space or crime reduction)
- Community engagement in the process
- Perceptions of the neighborhood
- Degree and character of public-private partnerships
Web-based Resources for Real Estate Redevelopment
» Back to Table of Contents
|
 |