|
|
|
Glossary of Terms
The terms listed below appear in this report to describe findings and
recommendations. They are presented and defined here as the
Advisory Committee used them, which is in the context of local and
regional community and economic development.
Capacity Building
Mobilizing of individual and organizational assets from the
community and combining those assets with others to
achieve community building goals. 20
In its work for this report, the Advisory Committee considered
the special needs for capacity building in distressed
communities and regions for convening civic, business, and
governmental partners and collaborators to formulate and
implement strategic plans and to access resources under the
Strengthening America’s Communities Initiative. In addition,
the Committee sees an important component of capacity
building to include strengthening the skills of state, regional,
and community economic development officials to allow
them to facilitate regional governance models, strategic competitiveness
strategies, partnerships, actions, performance,
and accountability.
Challenge Grants
Challenge grants are competitive grants available to communities
or regions that have adopted economic development
strategies and taken action to encourage investment and
business expansion. An Economic Development Challenge
Fund is a specific component of the Strengthening America’s
Communities Initiative that was proposed by President
George W. Bush as part of his FY 2006 budget request to
Congress. The initiative proposes a bonus grant program for
low-income communities facing economic challenges that
have already taken steps to improve economic conditions
and demonstrate readiness for development.
Clusters
Clusters are geographic concentrations of interconnected
companies and institutions in a particular field. Clusters
encompass an array of linked industries and other entities
important to competition. They include, for example, suppliers
of specialized inputs such as components, machinery, and
services, and providers of specialized infrastructure. Clusters
also often extend downstream to channels and customers
and laterally to manufacturers of complementary products,
and to companies in industries related by skills, technologies,
or common inputs. Finally, many clusters include governmental
and other institutions — such as universities, standards-
setting agencies, think tanks, vocational training
providers, and trade associations — that provide specialized
training, education, information, research, and technical
support.
Clusters represent critical masses of unusual competitive
success in particular fields. Clusters can be concentrated in
one economic region or may spill across several regions. The
success of the cluster depends on taking full advantage of the
distinct assets and knowledge of the places involved. The
enduring competitive advantages of a region increasingly lie
in the things located within the region — knowledge, relationships,
and motivation — that distant rivals cannot
match. Untangling the paradox of location in a global economy
reveals a number of key insights about how companies
continually create competitive advantage.What happens
inside companies is important, but clusters reveal that the
immediate business environment outside companies plays a
vital role as well. This role of locations has been long overlooked,
despite striking evidence that innovation and
competitive success in so many fields are geographically
concentrated. 21
Community Development
Activities that increase positive outcomes within a community
by linking individuals and organizations working toward
common ends. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development more broadly defines community development
as being “many different programs that provide assistance to
a wide variety of grantees.” (See the section of this report
titled “A Definition in Flux” for an expanded discussion of
the meanings and uses of the terms “community development”
and “economic development.”)
Competitive Grants
Grants awarded by means of a review of relative merits of
multiple proposals, whereby grant requests proposing activities
with greater impact and more certain outcomes are given
priority over requests where activities will have less impact
and less certain outcomes. Competitive grants typically
require matching funds and leveraging of nonfederal investments
and job creation.
» Page 2 of 3
|
|
|